
Theory of inverse probability or odds weighting
Core Clinical Sciences
transportIPMath.Rmd
Let be the outcome of interest, be the (binary, coded as 0 for control and 1 for treatment) treatment, be the indicator for study participation (so that means that the subject is in the population of the original study, while means that the subject is in the target population), be covariates to control for confounding in the original study and be effect modifiers. Let and be counterfactual outcomes associated with control and treatment, respectively. The primary objective of transportability analysis is to estimate the ATE in the target population:
Simply taking the difference in sample means using the original study data will only unbiasedly estimate the quantity which is different from the target ATE due to confounding and the different distributions of effect modifiers.
Let and To control for confounding, the estimator will unbiasedly estimate the quantity which uses the first set of weights and is the IP weighting approach in causal inference. However, to estimate the target ATE, the estimator should be used instead, which incorporates the second set of weights to unbiasedly estimate the target ATE. This is extended to estimate the coefficients of any marginal structural model in the target population in the same manner as IP weighting: more specifically, the marginal structural model coefficients are estimated by fitting regression models on the original study data with the weights .
For more information, check out the “What If” book on causal inference (Hernán and Robins 2024) and Ling, et al.’s application of IOPW to transportability analysis (Ling et al. 2022).